Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 15 May 2021 7:04pm
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT COURT CAN ENTERTAIN A WRIT PETITION EVEN IN THE PRESENCE OF AN ALTERNATE REMEDY
638 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices Uday Umesh Lalit and Indira Banerjee passed a #Judgment dated 12-05-2021 in the case of Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd. And Anr. v. CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited And Anr. {Special Leave Petition (C) NO. 8630 OF 2021} and held that presence…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 8 May 2021 11:49am
SUPREME COURT HOLDS BUYER ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION FOR LAND ACQUISITION
1101 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and M.R. Shah passed a #Judgment dated 30-04-2021 in the case of Sukhbir v. Ajit Singh {CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1653 OF 2021} and held that that a #buyer is entitled to #compensation along with interest and solatium for land acquisition under the provisions…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 7 May 2021 8:21pm
SUPREME COURT STRIKES DOWN WEST BENGAL HOUSING INDUSTRY REGULATION ACT, 2017
538 0 0
A Two Judge Bench of the #SupremeCourt has in a recent case of Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE) & Anr. vs The State of West Bengal & Anr. Writ Petition (C) No. 116 of 2019 passed a #Judgment dated 04-05-2021 and #struck down the #constitutionalvalidity of the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 (#WBHIRA) for being…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 7 May 2021 6:39pm
SUPREME COURT REITERATES THAT A CONTRACT HAS TO BE INTERPRETED IN LITERAL TERMS
621 0 0
The Hon’ble Bench of the #SupremeCourt on India in the case of Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) versus E.S. Solar Power Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. [CA No. 9273/2019], vide its Judgment dated 03.05.2021 reiterated that a liberal or a narrow approach cannot be adopted to construe a #contractual clause in an #agreement. A contract has to…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 1 May 2021 11:31am
DELHI HIGH COURT SETS ASIDE UNREASONABLE ORDERS PASSED BY DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE
958 0 0
The #DelhiHighCourt has in a recent case of Ericsson India Global Services Private Limited vs Union of India and Others WP (C) 13249 of 2019, passed a Judgment dated 27-04-2021 and directed the Respondents to consider the #claims of the Petitioners under Service Exports from India Scheme (#SEIS), which were unreasonably rejected by the Respondents.To…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 1 May 2021 11:13am
DELHI HIGH COURT HOLDS THAT TRANSFER OF SHARES IN A LEASEHOLD PROPERTY IS NOT DEEMED TO BE TRANSFER OF ASSETS
1026 0 0
The #DelhiHighCourt in the case of Vipul Plastic And Allied Industries Pvt Ltd vs DDA, vide its Judgment dated 26.04.2021 while deciding a conversion of Delhi Development Authority (#DDA) Commercial Property from #leasehold to #freehold held that DDA could not charge unearned increase for transfer of #shares in the company as the said transfer was…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 1 May 2021 11:00am
SUPREME COURT DISMISSES BANKS’ APPLICATIONS FOR RECALL OF DISCLOSURE DIRECTIONS TO RBI
1124 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices L. Nageswara Rao and Vineet Saran passed a Judgment dated 28-04-2021 in the case of Reserve Bank of India v. Jayantilal N. Mistry & Anr. M.A. No.2342 of 2019 in Transferred Case (Civil) No.91 of 2015 whereby it dismissed an Application filed by miscellaneous #Banks…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 24 Apr 2021 6:45pm
SUPREME COURT ISSUES GUIDELINES ON APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED JUDGES TO ADJUDICATE LONG PENDING CASES IN HIGH COURTS
805 0 0
The #SupremeCourt has in a recent case of Lok Prahari through its General Secretary S.N. Shukla IAS (Retd.) vs Union of India and others has passed a Judgment dated 20-04-2021 and activated a dormant provision of #Article224A of the Constitution of India 1950 (#Constitution) for appointment of #adhocjudges to deal with the steep rise in backlog of…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 24 Apr 2021 6:36pm
SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS VALIDITY OF CHANGE OF SEAT OF ARBITRATION BY MUTUAL AGREEMENT
941 0 0
The Two Judge Bench of the Hon’ble #SupremeCourt of India comprising of Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hrishikesh Roy passed a Judgment dated 13-04-2021 in the case of M/S Inox Renewables Ltd. v. Jayesh Electricals Ltd. Civil Appeal No. 1556 Of 2021 (Arising out of SLP (C) No.29161 of 2019) and held that if the parties to #arbitration mutually…
Advocate Sushila
Advocate Sushila Ram 24 Apr 2021 6:28pm
SUPREME COURT HOLDS THAT TWO INDIAN PARTIES CAN DESIGNATE A SEAT OF ARBITRATION OUTSIDE INDIA
690 0 0
It is common knowledge that the #seat of #arbitration determines the applicable law governing the arbitration including the procedural aspects. When parties specify a particular country as the seat of arbitration in an arbitration agreement, then, the applicable law of such country would govern the arbitration proceedings.To read more, please visit…
New Members view all

×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.
×

SAARTHTo Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com