NISHANT
Limitation can't be circumvented by resorting to S. 319 of CrPC in cheque bouncing cases
NISHANT MEHROTRA 13 Jan 2018

Limitation can't be circumvented by resorting to S. 319 of CrPC in cheque bouncing cases

SC :: Limitation can't be circumvented by resorting to S. 319 of CrPC in cheque bouncing cases.


The question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against DAKSHIN within the period prescribed under THE NEGOTIABLE ACT is not examined by either of the courts below. As rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed invoking Section 319 CrPC, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against DAKSHIN beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the Negotiable Instruments Act.


Case:

N. Harihara Krishna Vs. J. Thomas.


Citation:

2017 (8) Supreme 674.


Did you find this write up useful? YES 0 NO 0
×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.
×

SAARTHTo Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com