Ahir Mitra
Law Student

Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India


The petitioners, in this case, challenged the constitutional validity of section 18-A of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018. The petition was filed on the grounds that section 18-A of the Act renders the verdict of Subhash Kashinath Mahajan v. State of Maharashtra &anr[1]. null and void. The court found that the Prevention of Atrocities Act's provisions had been abused.



[1] (2018) 6 SCC 454.

User Comments

Prashant Bajpai   21 Feb 2023 7:36pm
Nice
Reply

×

C2RMTo Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

0

DAYS

0

HOURS

0

MINUTES

0

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.
×

SAARTHTo Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com