JURISPRUDENCE OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO EVIDENTIARY VALUE IN INDIA

0 Like |
0 Comment |
33 |
0 |
1 |
0

CHAPTER – 01INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY“The foremost duty of the Criminal Justice System is to provide fair and speedy justice to the victims of the crime and their families. The right to free, fair, and speedy trial is a basic inalienable human right implicit under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Fairness in the criminal justice process must be ensured both individually and collectively. This can be achieved by enhancing crime detection and prosecution methods through the integration of forensic science techniques. Forensic science encompasses a wide range of disciplines, each with significant applications in criminal justice. One crucial area within forensic science is forensic psychology. This study focuses specifically on forensic psychology and its role in the administration of criminal justice.”“The field of forensic psychology is broad, encompassing five key branches: legal psychology, criminal psychology, correctional psychology, police psychology, and victimology and victim services. Legal psychology addresses psychological aspects within legal contexts. Criminal psychology focuses on crime and delinquency. Correctional psychology deals with psychological services in correctional settings. Police psychology involves the use of psychological services for selecting police candidates, managing stress, and addressing emotional issues experienced by officers and their families. Lastly, victimology and victim services support victims through psychological interventions and services.” “Forensic psychology has significant applications across pretrial, trial, and post-trial stages, with its primary impact in the pretrial investigation phase. It evaluates an individual's competence to stand trial and assists the court in determining whether the person should be treated as an adult or juvenile, and if they are sane or insane. It also influences decisions on the appropriateness and severity of punishment or alternatives to punishment. Forensic psychologists often serve as expert witnesses in court.[1] Crucially, they aid in interrogations of suspects, victims, and witnesses to uncover the truth and gather background information on crimes, helping to exonerate the innocent and prosecute the guilty. Forensic psychology tests enhance the reliability of circumstantial evidence and corroborate other evidence during trials. It's essential to ensure that evidence from these tests meets international standards for fair trials to be admissible[2].” STATEMENT OF PROBLEM“The intersection of jurisprudence and forensic psychology within the context of criminal justice presents a complex landscape, particularly concerning the evidentiary value attributed to psychological assessments and insights in India. Despite the growing recognition of forensic psychology's significance in criminal proceedings, there exists a dearth of comprehensive understanding and systematic exploration of its jurisprudential implications within the Indian legal framework. This research aims to address the key problem areas. There is a lack of a comprehensive theoretical framework that integrates principles of jurisprudence with the practical application of forensic psychology in the Indian criminal justice system. This deficiency hinders the establishment of clear guidelines for the admissibility, interpretation, and weight given to psychological evidence in legal proceedings. The criteria for the admissibility of forensic psychological evidence in Indian courts remain ambiguous and inconsistently applied. This ambiguity poses significant challenges to legal practitioners, forensic psychologists, and judges in determining the reliability and relevance of psychological assessments and expert opinions in criminal cases. Communication gaps between legal professionals and forensic psychologists impede the effective utilization of psychological evidence in legal proceedings. The lack of mutual understanding and collaboration between these disciplines contributes to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and potential miscarriages of justice[3]. The applicability and relevance of Western-centric forensic psychological theories and methodologies in the Indian context raise concerns regarding cultural sensitivity, validity, and reliability. It is imperative to explore how cultural factors influence the interpretation and utilization of psychological evidence within the Indian criminal justice system. The absence of standardized ethical and professional guidelines specific to the practice of forensic psychology within the Indian legal system underscores the need for a critical examination of existing practices and the formulation of ethical standards that safeguard the rights and well-being of all stakeholders involved.”“Addressing these problem areas is crucial for advancing the understanding of the jurisprudence of forensic psychology in criminal justice in India and fostering the development of informed policies, practices, and procedures that uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and accountability.” 1.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURESingh, R. (2019). "Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Criminal Trials: An Indian Perspective." This study investigates the legal framework governing the admissibility of expert evidence, including forensic psychological assessments, in Indian criminal trials. It discusses the criteria used by Indian courts to evaluate the reliability and relevance of such evidence, highlighting challenges and areas for improvement[4].Sharma, A. (2018). "Jurisprudential Evolution of Forensic Psychology: A Critical Analysis." Sharma's work provides a critical analysis of the jurisprudential development of forensic psychology within the context of criminal justice. It traces the historical evolution of forensic psychology in India and examines the impact of legal precedents and legislative reforms on the admissibility and interpretation of psychological evidence in Indian courts[5].Verma, S. (2019). "Cultural Considerations in Forensic Psychological Assessments: Implications for Indian Criminal Justice." This study explores the influence of cultural factors on the interpretation and applicability of forensic psychological assessments in Indian criminal justice proceedings. It discusses the need for culturally sensitive approaches to forensic psychology and highlights the challenges posed by cross-cultural differences in understanding behavior and mental health[6].Patel, K. (2021). "Expert Testimony and Judicial Decision-making: A Case Study Analysis in Indian Criminal Courts." Patel's research offers a case study analysis of judicial decisions involving expert testimony, including forensic psychological evidence, in Indian criminal courts. It examines factors influencing judicial decision-making and the role of forensic psychology in shaping legal outcomes[7].Joshi, P. (2018). "Ethical Challenges in Forensic Psychology Practice: Perspectives from India." Joshi's study explores ethical challenges encountered by forensic psychologists in India and discusses the need for standardized ethical guidelines and professional standards. It examines issues such as confidentiality, informed consent, and conflicts of interest in the practice of forensic psychology within the Indian legal context[8].1.3 RESEARCH GAP “Despite the growing recognition of the importance of forensic psychology within the criminal justice system in India, there exists a significant research gap in understanding the nuanced jurisprudential implications of forensic psychological evidence, particularly concerning its evidentiary value and admissibility standards.” “Existing literature has addressed various aspects of forensic psychology in the Indian context, but several gaps persist.” “While there is a body of literature examining the application of forensic psychology in criminal justice settings in India, there is a notable gap in research specifically focusing on the jurisprudential aspects. Few studies comprehensively explore the legal standards of admissibility and reliability criteria for forensic psychological evidence and their interpretation within Indian courts.””Despite the theoretical discussions surrounding the use of forensic psychological evidence in legal proceedings, there is a scarcity of empirical studies providing quantitative insights into the prevalence, patterns, and outcomes of forensic psychological assessments in Indian criminal cases. This gap hinders a comprehensive understanding of the practical implications and challenges faced in courtroom settings. While fairness and due process are fundamental principles of criminal justice systems worldwide, there is a dearth of research specifically examining how the admissibility and utilization of forensic psychological evidence in India align with fair trial principles. Understanding whether and how forensic psychological evidence may impact the right to a fair trial is crucial for ensuring procedural justice. With the increasing reliance on forensic psychological assessments in legal proceedings, there is a pressing need for research addressing the regulatory gaps and guidelines governing the investigative and evidentiary use of forensic psychological tests in India. Existing literature lacks comprehensive discussions on the development and implementation of regulatory frameworks to ensure ethical and accountable practices. While some studies acknowledge the influence of cultural factors on forensic psychological assessments, there remains a gap in research specifically examining how cultural and contextual considerations impact the interpretation and admissibility of forensic psychological evidence within the Indian legal system. Understanding cultural nuances is essential for ensuring the validity and fairness of forensic psychological practices. Addressing these research gaps is essential for advancing scholarly understanding and practical application of forensic psychology within the Indian criminal justice system. By filling these gaps, future research can contribute to the development of informed policies, practices, and procedures that uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and accountability.” 1.4 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES “The primary objective of this research thesis is to critically examine the jurisprudence of forensic psychology within the framework of criminal justice in India, with a specific focus on the evidentiary value attributed to forensic psychological evidence in courtrooms.” The research aims to achieve the following objectives i. To evaluate legal standards of admissibility applied to forensic psychological evidence in India, particularly concerning the interpretation and utilization of such evidence in court proceedings ii. To investigate the extent to which these legal standards ensuring fair trial, as adopted by common law countries, are satisfied in the Indian context when dealing with forensic psychological tests. iii. To analyze whether forensic psychological evidence satisfies the admissibility and reliability criteria outlined in legal standards, ensuring the right to a fair trial for individuals involved in criminal proceedings in India. iv. To identify the need for proper regulation of the investigative and evidentiary use of forensic psychological tests in India, considering factors such as ethical standards, professional guidelines, and procedural safeguards to uphold the principles of fairness, justice, and accountability in the criminal justice system.“By addressing these research objectives, this study seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of the jurisprudential challenges and opportunities associated with the use of forensic psychological evidence in Indian criminal justice, ultimately aiming to inform policy, practice, and regulatory frameworks to ensure the protection of individuals' rights and the integrity of legal proceedings.” 1.5 RESEARCH QUESTIONS i. What are the legal standards of admissibility adopted by India in interpreting forensic psychological evidence in courtrooms? ii. To what extent are these legal standards ensuring fair trial satisfied in the Indian context when dealing with forensic psychological tests? iii. How does forensic psychological evidence in India adhere to the admissibility and reliability criteria outlined in legal standards, ensuring the right to a fair trial for individuals involved in criminal proceedings? iv. Are there instances where evidence based on forensic psychological tests in Indian courts may violate the right to a fair trial by falling within evidentiary barriers regarding the admission of relevant evidence? v. What are the regulatory needs concerning the investigative and evidentiary use of forensic psychological tests in India, and how can these needs be addressed to uphold the principles of fairness, justice, and accountability in the criminal justice system?1.6 SCOPE OF STUDY“The study will be beneficial for improving the investigation mechanism of our criminal justice system by examining the jurisprudential aspects of forensic psychology within the Indian legal framework. The study will provide an in-depth understanding about the importance of criminal investigation and the role of scientific tools and techniques to make such investigation more accurate and effective. The research will encompass an in-depth analysis of legal standards of admissibility and fairness as adopted by common law countries, with a specific emphasis on their applicability and implementation in India. The study will examine various forms of forensic psychological evidence, including but not limited to assessments, expert opinions, and evaluations, within the context of criminal justice proceedings in India. Analysis will be conducted on the adherence of forensic psychological evidence to admissibility and reliability criteria outlined in legal standards, ensuring the right to a fair trial. The research will investigate instances where evidence based on forensic psychological tests may potentially violate the right to a fair trial, focusing on evidentiary barriers and implications for legal proceedings. The study will identify regulatory gaps and provide recommendations for proper regulation of the investigative and evidentiary use of forensic psychological tests in India, aiming to enhance fairness, justice, and accountability in the criminal justice system. While primarily focusing on legal and forensic psychological perspectives, the study may also draw insights from related disciplines such as criminology, sociology, and ethics to provide a comprehensive understanding of the research topic. The study will consider relevant literature, cases, and developments up to the present time, with a focus on recent jurisprudential trends and emerging issues in the field of forensic psychology in criminal justice in India.” 1.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY“There is hardly any research study without limitation and similarly this research too has some limitations. Despite efforts to provide a comprehensive overview, the study may not cover every aspect of forensic psychology in criminal justice exhaustively due to the broad scope of the topic. Certain niche areas or specific subtopics within forensic psychology and legal jurisprudence may receive less attention. Access to certain legal documents, case files, or empirical data relevant to forensic psychology practices in India may be restricted, limiting the depth of analysis in some areas. This could potentially result in gaps in the empirical foundation of the study. The findings and conclusions drawn from the study may not be universally applicable beyond the context of India or the specific legal and cultural framework examined. Factors such as cultural differences, variations in legal systems, and regional practices may limit the generalizability of the research findings. While the study aims to adopt an interdisciplinary approach by integrating legal and forensic psychological perspectives, navigating the complexities of multiple disciplines may present challenges. Ensuring coherence and clarity in synthesizing insights from diverse fields could be demanding. Given the dynamic nature of legal systems and evolving practices in forensic psychology, the study's findings may be subject to temporal limitations. New legislation, judicial precedents, or advancements in forensic psychological techniques occurring after the study's completion may not be fully captured. Despite efforts to maintain objectivity, researcher bias or subjectivity may inadvertently influence the interpretation of findings or the formulation of recommendations. Conscious efforts will be made to mitigate bias through rigorous research methods and critical reflection. Language barriers and cultural nuances inherent in legal documents, scholarly literature, or forensic psychological assessments may pose challenges, particularly in the context of research conducted in India. Translation issues or cultural differences in legal terminology may affect the accuracy of analysis. Ethical considerations related to the sensitive nature of forensic psychological assessments and legal proceedings must be carefully navigated. Ensuring confidentiality, privacy, and informed consent while conducting research in this field is paramount, which may pose logistical or ethical challenges. The availability of time, funding, and other resources may impose limitations on the extent of data collection, analysis, and research activities. These constraints could impact the depth and breadth of the study's investigation and may influence the feasibility of certain research methodologies.” 1.8 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY“The methodology adopted for present research is doctrinal and empirical in order to find answers to the research question, to attain research objectives, and for testing the hypothesis formulated. The study will employ a mixed-methods research design, integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide a comprehensive understanding of the jurisprudence of forensic psychology in criminal justice in India. This will involve both qualitative analysis of legal documents, case law, and scholarly literature, as well as quantitative analysis of empirical data, if available. Legal documents such as statutes, case judgments, and legal precedents will be analyzed to understand the legal standards and practices regarding the admissibility of forensic psychological evidence in Indian courts. Scholarly literature from legal and forensic psychology journals will also be reviewed to gather insights into theoretical frameworks, case studies, and jurisprudential discussions. Primary sources include the Constitution, legislation, and case laws from India, the USA, the UK, and other common law countries like Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, as well as rulings from International Courts and relevant international instruments. Secondary sources encompass books, journal articles, conference papers, web articles, magazines, and newspaper reports. If applicable, quantitative data related to the use of forensic psychological evidence in criminal cases in India may be obtained from official records, judicial databases, or empirical studies. This data may include statistics on the frequency of forensic psychological assessments, their outcomes, and their impact on legal proceedings. Thematic analysis will be conducted on qualitative data obtained from legal documents, case studies, to identify recurring themes, patterns, and insights related to the research questions. Ethical guidelines will be followed throughout the research process and any sensitive information obtained from legal documents will be handled with utmost discretion and respect for ethical principles.” CHAPTER – 02FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE: AN OVERVIEW 2.1 INTRODUCTION“In India, criminal activity is regarded as a significant societal concern. With each passing year, the incidence of crime is escalating, resulting in detrimental impacts on individuals, institutions, and governmental security entities. To mitigate such occurrences, various methodologies have been implemented, including forensic odontology, criminal profiling, forensic psychology, among others. The application of these methodologies is contingent upon factors such as the intricacy of the crime, the characteristics of the evidence, and the extent of forensic technological advancement[9]. In this context, the ensuing discussion will delineate the pivotal role played by forensic psychology in comprehending criminal behavior.”“The origins of psychology trace back to 1879 when the first dedicated research laboratory was established in Leipzig, Germany, marking the inception of systematic psychological inquiry. Consequently, for as long as psychology has existed, its application in crime management and the reduction of criminal activity has been evident[10]. The pervasive existence of crime across societies since ancient times, coupled with the persistent challenge of controlling its prevalence, suggests an inherent inclination towards criminal behavior within human nature. Hence, it is imperative to address and eradicate the underlying causes of crime within society.Psychology entails the systematic examination of behavioral patterns and cognitive functions exhibited by both humans and animals, conducted through empirical research methods within a scientific framework.”“The term "forensic" originates from the Latin word "forensic," which pertains to a platform or forum. Forensic science, broadly speaking, involves the application of scientific methodologies and techniques to facilitate the administration of justice. The terms "crime" or "criminal" possess contextual significance and should be interpreted and utilized in accordance with the specific legal and judicial framework of a particular state, country, or province. It is imperative to exercise caution in the use of these terms, recognizing that perceptions of criminality may vary across cultures, with actions deemed criminal in one culture potentially regarded differently in another[11].”“Forensic psychology serves as the nexus between the pursuit of justice and the comprehension of human behavior underlying criminal acts. It encompasses an understanding of the nuances of criminal law applicable within a jurisdiction, facilitating effective collaboration among judges, attorneys, and other pertinent legal authorities.” 2.2 FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY DEFINED“Forensic psychology is a specialized field within psychology that entails a methodical and scientific examination of human behavior within the parameters of law, criminality, and related contexts. The term "forensic" finds its origin in the Latin word "forensis," signifying "of the forum," historically denoting a venue for dispute resolution akin to contemporary courts (Huss, 2014). Forensic psychology, succinctly put, involves the application of psychological principles to the legal system. It is important to distinguish forensic psychology from forensic science, although they are closely interrelated. The primary distinction lies in the focus of their applications: whereas forensic scientists utilize chemical and biological sciences in law enforcement, national security, defense, or intelligence activities, forensic psychologists analyze the psychological dimensions of human behavior and their relevance to legal proceedings. Additionally, forensic psychology encompasses the application of psychological principles within both criminal and civil justice systems. The criminal justice system, comprised of law enforcement, judiciary, and correctional components, serves as a fundamental context for forensic psychological analysis[12].”“Forensic psychology can be construed as embracing both facets of the justice system, encompassing civil and criminal realms, along with two overarching domains of psychology: clinical and experimental. While delineating forensic psychology may appear ostensibly straightforward, it presents inherent complexities. These challenges arise from the diverse professional backgrounds of practitioners within the field. Individuals engaged in forensic psychology possess a spectrum of graduate and professional credentials. Some hold degrees in clinical or counseling psychology, while others have received graduate training in various psychological disciplines, such as social, developmental, cognitive, or neuropsychology. Additionally, professionals may have legal backgrounds, with some holding dual degrees in psychology and law. The nature of their contributions to forensic psychology varies considerably. Forensic psychologists operate both within and outside the legal system. Some offer direct services to the court, evaluating issues such as competency to stand trial, criminal responsibility, or child custody. Others engage in research, often affiliated with academic institutions, investigating fundamental or applied topics such as eyewitness behavior or jury decision-making. Furthermore, some practitioners integrate research endeavors with clinical practice.”“Forensic psychology denotes the confluence of psychology and the criminal justice apparatus, necessitating comprehension of pertinent criminal laws within respective jurisdictions to engage effectively with judicial officers, legal practitioners, and allied professionals. A crucial facet of forensic psychology entails the capacity to furnish testimony in court, translating psychological insights into the legal vernacular of courtroom proceedings, and delivering information to legal stakeholders in an intelligible manner. Moreover, to function as a credible witness, the forensic psychologist must grasp the philosophical underpinnings, procedural rules, and normative standards inherent in the judicial system[13].”“Questions posed by the court to a forensic psychologist typically pertain not to matters of psychology per se, but rather to legal inquiries, requiring responses rendered in a manner comprehensible to the court. For instance, the court often designates a forensic psychologist to evaluate a defendant's competence to stand trial or to assess the defendant's mental state at the time of the alleged offense. This evaluation, commonly termed an assessment of the defendant's sanity or insanity, pertains to matters of criminal responsibility and is predominantly legal in nature. Consequently, a forensic psychologist must possess the ability to convey psychological insights within a legal context, effectively translating psychological information into a framework understandable to the court. Forensic psychologists offer sentencing and treatment suggestions, as well as any additional information requested by the presiding judge. Moreover, forensic psychology encompasses the training and assessment of law enforcement officers or other personnel involved in legal enforcement. Additionally, forensic psychologists may contribute to the process of jury selection.”“Forensic psychology expertise finds application across diverse domains, including the treatment of mentally ill offenders, consultation with legal counsel (e.g., in jury selection), analysis of criminal intent and cognition, and practice within civil litigation. Additionally, forensic psychologists may opt to dedicate their careers solely to research endeavors, spanning investigations into eyewitness testimony or enhancement of interrogation techniques. Another facet of forensic psychology involves contributions to public policy, wherein researchers aid in the design of correctional facilities and prisons. In essence, the role of a forensic psychologist can be summarized as providing assistance to the legal system.”“The forensic psychologist adopts a distinct perspective when evaluating a client or defendant compared to a conventional clinical psychologist. Empathizing with the client's standpoint is not the primary objective of the forensic psychologist. Standard psychological assessments and interview techniques are inadequate when employed in forensic contexts. In forensic evaluations, it is imperative to scrutinize the coherence of factual data across various sources.”“Forensic evaluators are obligated to furnish the sources underpinning any information provided. In contrast to conventional applications of clinical psychology, obtaining informed consent is not a prerequisite when court-ordered assessments are conducted. Rather, the defendant must be apprised of the assessment's purpose and the lack of control over the utilization of gathered information. While psychologists rarely encounter issues of malingering or symptom fabrication in non-criminal clinical settings, forensic psychologists must adeptly discern exaggerated or simulated symptoms. Malingering manifests along a spectrum, necessitating forensic psychologists to possess proficiency in identifying varying degrees of feigned symptoms.”“Hence, forensic psychologists undertake a diverse array of duties within the criminal justice framework, with the most prominent being the preparation and provision of testimony in court proceedings. This responsibility has grown increasingly challenging as legal practitioners have become adept at challenging psychological testimonies. Assessing the client, preparing for testimony, and delivering testimony necessitate the forensic psychologist to possess a comprehensive understanding of the applicable law and legal context within the courtroom, utilizing resources such as the Crime Classification Manual and other authoritative references.”2.3 HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE“A pivotal milestone in the annals of forensic psychology's history was the establishment of the first psychological laboratory in 1879 by Wilhelm Wundt in Leipzig, Germany. At the Leipzig laboratory, both sensory and behavioral phenomena were systematically measured and subjected to experimental manipulation. Wundt pioneered experimental psychology within his laboratory, pursuing both theoretical and applied objectives. His refined methodologies and instruments significantly facilitated the endeavors of his students. These students, equipped with Wundt's techniques and instruments, disseminated throughout Europe, applying psychology to various facets of daily life, including matters pertinent to the legal domain. Scholars from both the Old and New Worlds journeyed to study under Wundt, subsequently making enduring contributions with relevance to jurisprudence upon their return. Notably, Cattell, as previously mentioned, conducted experimental investigations into the nature of testimony, elucidating the impacts of situational and individual disparities[14].” Historical personalities which led to development of Forensic Psychology:Wilhelm Wundt“Wilhelm Wundt played a pioneering role in advancing and refining the experimental method within the field of psychology. This rigorous approach laid the groundwork for a multitude of applied psychological inquiries, including those pertaining to legal matters. For example, during the 1890s, James McKeen Cattell conducted a series of experiments exploring the nature of testimony, thereby elucidating the impacts of situational and individual variations. Notably, these findings continue to be subject to examination in contemporary research[15].”J. McKeen Cattell“In 1893, Professor J. McKeen Cattell of Columbia University undertook informal inquiries concerning the nature of witness testimony. These studies involved posing a series of questions akin to those typically encountered in trial proceedings to 56 students. Following a brief period of 30 seconds for reflection, respondents were queried regarding their confidence levels in their responses. Despite prevailing beliefs regarding the unreliability of eyewitness testimony, Cattell acknowledged his astonishment at the extent of inaccuracies observed among the participating students[16].”Hugo Munsterburg“Professor Hugo Münsterberg, in his work "On the Witness Stand," compiled a series of previously published magazine articles, delineating a rational and scientific approach to scrutinizing facts testified by human witnesses through the application of Experimental Psychology within the realm of legal administration. Previously categorized as a pure science, Psychology has been elevated to the status of an applied science through the development of experimental methodologies, to which Münsterberg made significant contributions. Applied Psychology finds utility across diverse spheres of practical life, including but not limited to education, medicine, art, economics, and law[17].”Experience has revealed that certain facets of Applied Psychology offer invaluable support and guidance to practitioners across diverse practical domains. However, as Professor Münsterberg asserts, "The legal profession remains steadfast. Lawyers, judges, and jurors are steadfast in their belief that they do not require the expertise of experimental psychologists... They persist in the notion that their legal intuition and common sense suffice, and then some... Accordingly, within the legal domain, it becomes imperative not merely to depend on the technical discourse found in scholarly works, but rather to present the discourse in the most accessible manner feasible before the broader audience of the general reader[18]."Alfred Binet“In 1889, Alfred Binet played a pivotal role in establishing the inaugural psychological laboratory in France. Possessing a background in medicine and law, Binet harbored a keen interest in the application of psychology within the legal framework, notably concerning witness testimony[19]. However, Binet's seminal contribution to forensic psychology stemmed from his pioneering work in intellectual assessment. Collaborating with Theodore Simon, he devised the initial psychometric test of intelligence, laying the groundwork for subsequent forensic evaluations. Notably, in the United States, the Wechsler Intelligence Test for children emerged as a recurrent feature in juvenile court proceedings. Subsequently, group testing gained prominence, particularly within military contexts for recruit selection purposes, and soon thereafter, objective tests found widespread application across various professions, serving as instruments for gauging behavioral attributes, skills, attitudes, and the like. Of significant import to the field of forensic psychology was the judiciary's increasing acceptance of test results as admissible evidence in court proceedings[20].”William Marston“William Marston, a psychology graduate and holder of a law degree, devised not only the lasso of truth but also the systolic blood pressure test, which serves as the precursor to the contemporary lie detector.” The inspiration for a lie detection apparatus based on blood pressure arose from Marston's wife, Elisabeth, who remarked that "When she got mad or excited, her blood pressure seemed to climb[21]."“Following World War I, Marston embarked upon an academic trajectory and subsequently testified as an expert witness in the renowned 1923 Frye case. In this case, the defense sought to introduce his expert testimony, based on the systolic blood pressure test, to establish the innocence of the defendant. Frye stood accused of murder in the District of Columbia. Initially denying any involvement in the incident, Frye later confessed to the crime and provided law enforcement with accurate details regarding the killing. However, a few days subsequent to his confession, Frye recanted, asserting that he had only confessed due to the promise of a reward for his own conviction.”2.4 DISCIPLINES/ SPECIALITIES IN FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGYForensic psychology encompasses a variety of disciplines and specialties. Some of the key disciplines and specialties within forensic psychology include:1. Criminal Psychology: “This discipline focuses on understanding the mindset, behavior, and motivations of criminals. Criminal psychologists may assess individuals who have committed crimes, provide insight into criminal behavior, and assist law enforcement in profiling offenders. Criminal psychology primarily centers on analyzing the behavior, cognitive processes, and patterns exhibited by individuals engaged in criminal activity. Criminal psychologists are tasked with elucidating the underlying motivations and factors contributing to a perpetrator's actions. Their duties commonly encompass offender profiling, consultations, research endeavors, mental health assessments, and other psychological evaluations. Additionally, criminal psychologists may provide counseling, psychotherapy, and expert testimony within legal proceedings[22].”2. Legal Psychology: “Legal psychologists study the interaction between psychology and the legal system. They may conduct research on topics such as eyewitness testimony, jury decision-making, and the effectiveness of legal interventions. In legal psychology, psychological concepts and principles are applied within the framework of the legal system. Legal psychologists frequently provide guidance to judges and other individuals within the legal sphere to aid in decision-making processes. To distinguish between forensic psychology and legal psychology, it is important to note that while forensic psychology predominantly concerns itself with the study of criminal behavior and offenders, legal psychology directs its focus towards the cognitive processes of judges, legal procedures, and the broader legal system[23].”3. Victimology: “Victimologists specialize in studying the psychological effects of crime on victims. They may work with victims to assess and treat trauma, as well as conduct research on victimization patterns and prevention strategies.”4. Correctional Psychology: “Correctional psychologists work within the criminal justice system, providing mental health services to inmates in prisons and jails. They may also conduct assessments to determine the risk of reoffending and develop treatment plans to facilitate rehabilitation. The primary objective of correctional psychology, as implied by its title, is the rehabilitation and supervision of individuals within the criminal justice system. Accordingly, psychological concepts and principles are employed to facilitate correctional endeavors. Correctional psychology encompasses a wide array of topics, including aspects pertaining to prison environments, penitentiary administration, and interventions aimed at promoting rehabilitation among inmates and offenders.”5. Police Psychology: “Police psychologists focus on supporting law enforcement officers and agencies. They may provide counseling and mental health services to officers, conduct pre-employment screenings, and offer training on topics such as stress management and crisis intervention. Police psychology encompasses various facets of law enforcement, spanning governmental entities at local, state, and federal levels. It also encompasses employment-related matters concerning police personnel, encompassing recruitment, selection processes, police personality assessments, stress management, and evaluations of psychological attributes such as intelligence. Furthermore, police psychologists play a substantial role in training police personnel, and may also offer counseling and therapeutic interventions to address their needs as necessary[24].”6. Forensic Assessment: “Forensic assessors conduct evaluations to inform legal decisions. This may include assessing competency to stand trial, evaluating risk for violence or recidivism, and conducting psychological evaluations in child custody cases[25].”7. Forensic Neuropsychology: “Neuropsychologists specializing in forensic psychology assess how brain injuries or disorders may impact behavior and decision-making in legal contexts. They may testify as expert witnesses in cases involving brain trauma or neurological disorders.”8. Forensic Psychiatry: “While not strictly within the field of psychology, forensic psychiatrists also play a crucial role in the legal system by assessing and treating individuals with mental illness who are involved in legal proceedings. They may provide expert testimony on issues such as insanity and competency.”2.5 FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW“As previously elucidated, forensic psychology encompasses the application of psychological principles, philosophy, and methodologies within the legal and justice system. While law exclusively addresses legal matters, crime-related issues, perpetrators, victims, and a myriad of legal complexities, forensic psychology delves into understanding human behavior across various dimensions, encompassing emotional patterns, intelligence levels, and more. Law primarily addresses concerns pertaining to criminal and civil proceedings, with the overarching goal of dispensing justice to victims impacted by crime[26]. These victims may have endured significant losses, ranging from loss of livelihood to severe bodily injuries, amputations, and even loss of life. In order to administer justice to victims and perpetrators alike, the legal system often seeks the expertise of forensic psychologists for multifaceted assistance, including assessment and evaluation of the mental state of both victims and accused individuals[27]. Henceforth, forensic psychology and law maintain an intimate alliance, wherein psychology is extensively employed in the realm of law and its associated matters.”“Forensic psychologists, when tasked with evaluating the mental state of either a victim or an accused individual, conduct comprehensive assessments and evaluations, thereby presenting their expert testimony grounded in scientific findings derived from said assessments. Such evaluations may encompass assessments of an individual's competency to participate in legal proceedings, determination of criminal responsibility in cases involving mental disorders, among others. Additionally, through the practice of criminal profiling, forensic psychologists are capable of delineating the propensity of a perpetrator to engage in further criminal activities. Utilizing psychological tests and interview methodologies, forensic psychologists appraise the capacity, emotional stability, psychological well-being, and financial stability of individuals seeking custody of a child post-divorce or separation. Moreover, they conduct evaluations of the home environment and the character of prospective custodians, furnishing detailed reports to the court for consideration.” Top of FormTop of FormTop of Form“As forensic psychologists are involved in both criminal and civil litigation, they are required to possess comprehensive knowledge of all facets of the law. Forensic psychologists analyze the emotions, cognitive processes, and behaviors of individuals entangled in legal matters or interacting with the legal system in various capacities. Additionally, forensic psychologists operate within the legal framework and may undertake cases referred to them, which could involve individuals acting as either the accused or the victim.”“It is a widely recognized principle that the law serves to safeguard both the public and individual citizens from various forms of criminal activity and harm. In instances where an individual is subjected to assault, they seek recourse through legal channels, anticipating redress and appropriate sanctions for the perpetrator responsible for their injury. Moreover, within societal conflicts, the law establishes norms of acceptable conduct and delineates consequences for transgressions. Forensic psychology contributes to the equitable dispensation of justice by scrutinizing not only the physical elements but also the mental and psychological attributes of the individuals involved. Their analysis of cases is characterized by inductive reasoning and probabilistic evaluation.”“Regarding the involvement of forensic psychologists within court proceedings, they are summoned by law enforcement agencies, legal representatives, or even judicial authorities to conduct interviews and assessments of individuals involved in criminal activities. The insights gleaned from these interactions are utilized as evidence within the judicial system. For example, within the medico-legal domain, upon court authorization, a forensic psychologist may engage in rehabilitative efforts aimed at both perpetrators and victims of crime.”“In India, pursuant to Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, courts possess the authority to enlist the expertise of professionals such as forensic psychologists or document analysts. Consequently, forensic psychologists present factual evidence to aid the court in adjudicating cases with impartiality and equity, thereby facilitating the administration of justice in a fair and equitable manner.”“Moreover, the role of the forensic psychologist extends to evaluating the mens-rea, or the state of mind, of the individual in question. This entails…

C2RM… To Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

DAYS

HOURS

MINUTES

SECONDS

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

* We won’t use your email for spam, just to notify you of our launch.

JURISPRUDENCE OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO EVIDENTIARY VALUE IN INDIA

C2RM… To Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

SAARTH… To Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com

JURISPRUDENCE OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO EVIDENTIARY VALUE IN INDIA

Delete Resource Centre Attachment

Delete Resource Centre Image

Delete Confirmation

Synopsis

C2RM… To Know More

Something Awesome Is In The Work

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)

SAARTH… To Know More

Launching Soon : SAARTH, your complete client, case, practise & document management SAAS application with direct client chat feature.

If you want to know more give us a Call at :+91 98109 29455 or Mail info@soolegal.com

Upload Document

Edit Documents

INVOICE

Invoice: Share & Send

Add Client

Client Details

Add Client Address2

Delete Confirmation

Sign-up and we will notify you of our launch.
We’ll also give some discount for your effort :)